OPM, EGM Feature New GTA IV Previews, Screenshots

03
Apr
2008
By MishoM | 3rd Apr 2008 at 22:46 GMT in GTA IV | 4 Comments

The latest issues of Electronic Gaming Monthly (EGM) and Official PlayStation Magazine (OPM, U.S.) both feature brand new previews and screenshots of GTA IV. EGM received a preview of GTA IV’s multiplayer features, while it is unaware of what OPM got their hands on as of now.

EGM’s preview was four-pages long and contained three new screenshots, none of which are multiplayer ones, and none of which have appeared online (yet). To anyone with the magazine, be sure to send TGTAP your magazine scans of the new screens!

OPM’s preview also contained three new screenshots, which have appeared online in the form of scans (obviously not the best quality). They feature Niko being chased by the cops, running in his casual suit, and shooting someone or thing in a toilet. You can view the screenshots below:

OPMNew1_th.jpg OPMNew2_th.jpg OPMNew3_th.jpg

Thanks to Chargr for the screenshot scans!

Charger's photo
Charger 3rd April, 2008 @ 22:52 - Permalink

I forgot to make a topic here yesterday on the OPM Preview.

Here are those scans:

1207176272.jpg

1207176282.jpg

1207176338.jpg

They are readable, some interesting points as well.

mutu's photo
mutu 4th April, 2008 @ 12:12 - Permalink

Nice, I like the screenshots and the article :)

Swifty's photo
Swifty 4th April, 2008 @ 12:34 - Permalink

That muscle car looks awesome, I can't wait to see how it handles.

It sounds as if a lot of thought has gone into the multiplayer modes, they almost seem like complete missions in themselves. The cops & robbers style modes seem to have a lot of depth & freedom to them, I love the idea of using a gunship to cover/support your team mates on the ground, while they're on the move. I think this side of the game is going to have an incredible effect on the re-playabilty factor of this game.

Jared's photo
Jared 5th April, 2008 @ 03:49 - Permalink
...have appeared online in the form of scans (obviously not he best quality)...

Should be "the" ;)